Visit Bill Harrison's column >>

BILL HARRISON

"A once great website for serious news discussion. Needs a good housecleaning now."
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 113; Links Seeded: 1155
Member Since: 4/2007

Iraq: Go Deep or Get Out

Read ArticleArticle Source: The Washington Post
advertisement

Readers of Foreign Affairs will know that Stephen Biddle has been of the absolute best commentators on Iraq. Here he makes the argument why the "middle ground" approach advocated by the ISG, certain Democrats and certain Republicans doesn't make any sense from either a military standpoint or trying to affect a salutary outcome in the country. The heandline, however, is a bit misleading in that the time has long since passed when we could really "go deep" in Iraq. In fact, I've argued (as have many others) that the "surge" isn't nearly big enough and that we simply lack the wherewithal to mount one that would due to the fact that the Army and Marines are simply too small insofar as the number of active-duty soldiers is concerned without putting undue burdens on both them and the Guard and Reserves.

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":861979,"authorDomain":"thedcshuffle"}

Nice piece. I agree with the assessment though my take on it would be to push harder on the diplomatic and political fronts with Syria & Iran. I even wrote about this exact issue on the 9th. I don't think folks get how much is at risk. And I'm not even referring to the terrorism aspect. Link is here if you care to check it out.

{"commentId":861979,"threadId":"124918","contentId":"830459","authorDomain":"thedcshuffle"}
    Reply#1 - Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:10 AM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"124918","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"124918","contentId":"830459"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking