
One of Newsvine's central missions is to provide a forum where informed members can exchange views on issues of importance both here in the US and worldwide. To that end it offers us all the opportunity to either seed articles of interest from news publications or write our own stuff. All that said, I have a small beef to make.
This past weekend I seeded a link to the Washington Post's Outlook section entitled One Islam, Many Circles containing a group of articles written by various Muslim scholars and writers that offered a valuable overview both of the many strains of Islam but also a perspective on how Muslims view the West. I found it very enlightening and believed other readers would as well.
Well, lo and behold, it got four votes and no comments. Now I'm not grousing here as I view my presence on NV as an avocation and not a vocation. But goodness gracious wouldn't one think something like this would have drawn a little interest? Instead, the link was subsumed within a tidal wave of ideologically tilted seeds that while adding much heat didn't contain much light. My friend BlaiseP's excellent article Iraq Commentary and An Exit Strategy fared slightly better with some 19 votes and 49 comments but nowhere near such piffling nonsense as that drawn by endless musings on the DC Madam and other such piffle.
Given what I've seen of the historical knowledge exhibited by many NV members I simply have to question whether the Vine is succeeding in the mission to make us all smarter and that's a shame.
Perhaps interest leans more toward the purient rather than the politic.
Seems so, along with some truly "irritable" types. Some appear to subscribe to doom 'n gloom domestic prognostications rather than opting to stand back and look at the international scene from all sides.
That's not really it at all.
It may seem that good things are ignored, or that it's all luck, but it's really exposure that matters. Let me explain.
The key is to get people on your friends lists, and get people to watchlist you. If you do that, whatever you seed/write will show up on many comment trackers. If you don't, you can produce a diamond, but no one will know.
Comments help. Comments that people vote for, because they're on-topic, insightful, informative, etc. Comments that are likely to get collapsed work against you. No one wants to read the the "angry guy."
It takes time and effort. Killfile didn't start out where he is. He wrote great stuff, for a long time, before anyone really noticed. Now, if he seeds something it's likely to show up on 300+ comment trackers. he's earned that.
Groups help, if you put it in the proper group. For example, that seed you mentioned above, if clipped or published to Middle East Vine, or Worldviews, would have generated interest.
I would have read that seed, but I didn't know it existed. Why not? Simple. Your comments are grey to me, Bill.
Allow me to demonstrate. I'm going to go read that seed, leave a comment, and clip it to appropriate groups. mark the timestamp on this comment, and check your seed in 24 hours. Perhaps sooner.
Oh, your link doesn't go to the seed, it goes to the article itself. Can you give me the link to the original seed?
I left a comment and clipped it to three groups.
Start your clock, and behold the power of the comment tracker.
Bill,
Great article, I've only written two, and emerged with the same feeling. All the time and effort, and for what? I'm going to read your article on Islam, I'm always interested with articles of this type. It's the first pagers that get noticed, and usually the left wing vs. right wing or religious controversial stuff that evokes so much emotion around here.
I actually emailed Newsvine staff and asked if there were a way to scan "second page", "third page" of newsvine. They replied with the suggestion that I use NewsViz, the colored bar doohickey on the front page. I guess we could search by tags also, but I really would like to catch the diamonds that Dennis referred to without having to put a hundred members on my watchlist, the comment tracker would be in the thousands...
Bill, seeding is also luck of the draw the way NV has been built. From observation, NV is not very good at organizing information, which, to be fair, is a relatively complex task. After all, how do you allow information to self-organize in a correct manner without introducing systemic bias?
From what I understand, NV has taken an old-school one-page-for-all model, which is, essentially, creating a system where information quickly turns into stale air unless it is picked up by a current and carried using some algorithms that I don't think have been disclosed. Seeds seem to have very little weight. Stories have a bit more. But it is stories that draw attention within the first X amount of time that get on top and stay. It's a bit like a rollercoaster - you have to end up on the right tracks to be taken for a ride.
There are numerous solutions to this problem. One is ditching the one-view-to-rule-them-all approach and distributing analysis accross the board. I am sure they are doing this to some extent, but, for now, it's probably locale based... Another solution is to increase rotation of articles on the front page to increase chances of exposure.
But NV seems to have taken another appoach - the moment is gained if you are in the system for a while and you participate. Then you slowly float up to the top. The problem with this approach is evident: a newcomer can't really contribute. He has to make friends and integrate...
Of course, a bias towards encouraging users to participate and integrate into the community isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Yeah, but the problem is that many users will get discouraged + a lot of good information will be lost. Right now the situation is such that if some newbie seeds something and I feel strongly about out, I would get more exposure to this information by reseeding it rather than participating on their seed. This means that older users can prevent entry of new users in a way.
I've seen a few people reseed stuff to "get the seed more exposure," and I find it detestable.
Clip it to your column and leave a comment, but don't steal the seed from someone else.
From what I understand, your clipping information doesn't significantly improve the exposure for the original seed. That is, if a top user seeds vs. a top user clips, the effect is different (which it should not be). Would be nice if NV was more open about their algorithms.
Sure it does.
If i clip your seed to my column, it shows up in both columns. Anyone who has watchlisted either of us will see it.
Dennis, this doesn't help the article get to the front page. It looks like Newsvine is bulit in a way that, if Killfile seeds something and if a newbie seeds something, if Killfile clips it, it won't end up on the front page. If Killfile seeds it, it would get more of a push... may be I am wrong.
Bill,
I wrote an article about How to get noticed on Newsvine." I hope you like it. It's about some more pro-active strategies to get exposure.
No, Nikita.
If i clip your seed to my column, it's as if we both seeded it, though the comments and votes will still go to the original seeder - you.
If you want to help a seed get exposure, leave a comment that will put it on comment trackers. Clip it to your column to put it on watchlists. Hell, email a few people and direct them to it.
But reseeding is simply stealing someone else's seed, no matter who does it.
Check your email.
Bill, was this directed at me? If so, I never got your email.
Yeah, I got it now. Just came through.
Thanks.
Dennis, this is why you are an artist and I a web developer. I don't see evidence that clipping = seeding with respect to weight of the article within the system. If you are right, this should be advertised by Newsvine to encourage clipping.
Roads, I've found that this site is mainly populated by the young and the poorly educated with a few notable exceptions.
I am neither young or poorly educated. Dennis and Nikita made some really good points about Newsvine. I have seeded some things that did not get many votes either. I have also seeded some things that got many comments or votes and I really could not figure out what made that particular seed different.
I have observed that the Newsvine community is very eclectic. Some are deeply passionate about a particular cause. Others are light hearted and prefer satire type news. This is really how our world is made. We are diverse and that is OK. I have learned much about the world and people since I have become a member of the Newsvine Community. These people will help you, support you, laugh with you, and steer you in the right direction, so you can get smarter .
Au contraire, I would day that most of the members of NV are neither young nor under-educated (I, for one, am rather over-educated). That's rather a big leap of the imagination just because one of your seeds didn't get much attention. It's also rather offensive.
Ultimately, as with newspapers and news programmes, people read and discuss what they want to read. There's no formula, but that's part of the experience.
The great thing about a friends list is that they often comment on things you miss and would probably enjoy, such as this, by it, I've visited two links that I thoroughly enjoyed.
Thanks!
All hail the power of the comment tracker, for it is good!
:D
I am relatively young (36) and have a high school education. I am also brand new to NV. I joined yesterday after I followed a search link in google on an issue that really got my blood boiling. I began browsing the site a bit and I have been mostly impressed with the level of articulation and knowledge demonstrated by both the "posters" and the "commenters" in the half-dozen seeds I've read. I look forward to becoming an integrated member of the forum.
And welcome you are Bill. I haven't been here very long myself but I'm enjoying it for the most part - sometimes too much - and I've certainly managed to avoid any 'thickies' yet. :)
May I ask, what was the article you found on Google which incensed you so?
Yes, I meant the Bill I replied to in #7.
Sorry Bill, I think he meant me. The news story that got me irritated was a story about a soldier who hired someone to shoot him in the leg while home on leave so he did not have to return to Iraq. I'm still not quite sure how to post a link here but the name of the post on NV was "New website will keep track of questionable news stories."
If you check out my profile it's one of the few I've commented on...
I have to warn you though, my comment posts on the thread are a little long.
Thanks Bill - I haven't seen that story.
And I'm a 'she'! :)
Bill H
Billman is too new to be able to put links in comments. He needs vineacity or vineness. You know that that little green stick thingy.
Sorry about that Gen, heheh. I realized that after I posted and wandered to your profile.
Thanks for the tip Bill. I have a little experience with HTML, but I've gotten a bit rusty, and really appreciate the link.
No problems at all, Bill(man). Easy mistake and it's not the first time it's been made here! :)
One of us is Irish and it ain't me.
My friend BlaiseP's excellent article Iraq Commentary and An Exit Strategy fared slightly better with some 19 votes and 49 comments but nowhere near such piffling nonsense as that drawn by endless musings on the DC Madam and other such piffle.
I'm betting that Entertainment Tonight also has bigger ratings than the Sunday morning gasbag yakfests. You need to try to find a way to work Ms. Lohan or Ms. Spears into the ME equation.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |