Visit Bill Harrison's column >>

BILL HARRISON

"A once great website for serious news discussion. Needs a good housecleaning now."
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 113; Links Seeded: 1155
Member Since: 4/2007

Honey, I Lost My Job -- Now Bring Me My Bible, My Rifle and Get Them Mexicans Off the Porch!!

Jimmy Carter and brother Billy at the latter's gas station. Is such a photo op in Barack Obama's future?

advertisement

". . .Looking for a way out of this crisis, our people have turned to the Federal Government and found it isolated from the mainstream of our Nation's life. Washington, D.C., has become an island. The gap between our citizens and our Government has never been so wide. The people are looking for honest answers, not easy answers; clear leadership, not false claims and evasiveness and politics as usual."

Jimmy Carter, "Malaise Speech" 15 July 1979

"You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.

And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustration."

Barack Obama in a speech at a fundraiser in San Francisco, 6 April 2008

God save the Republic from Democrats auditioning to serve as psychoanalyst-in-chief to the nation's body politic. To hear Democrats tell the tale it's all gloom, doom and various pathologies brought about now by a generation of alleged GOP economic neglect. As Carter's speech points out, Obama is but the latest Democrat to talk down to and insult people who might have religious faith, be concerned about Second Amendment rights or have reservations over the effects of illegal immigration on this country's society and economy. How else would one explain their seeming to cling to ideas that run counter to the party looking out for their best interests? Or as one other clueless liberal asked, What's The Matter With Kansas?

Carter found out the hard way in 1980 when Ronald Reagan cast aside the malaise and focused instead on the innate sense of American optimism and the sunny slopes of the Shining City Upon a Hill. Key to Reagan's winning his victory were those who came to be known as "Reagan" Democrats – working-class men and women who like Reagan lamented that they hadn't so much left their party as much as their party had left them. These Reagan Democrats, with the exception of Bill Clinton's plurality wins in '92 and '96, would cement GOP control of the White House for a generation.

Following John Kerry's loss in 2004, new DNC Chairman Howard Dean and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee head Rahm Emanuel would focus on a "50 state strategy" that would no longer cede red-leaning states to the GOP and recruited candidates of more conservative mien which when combined with GOP scandals and the decline in President Bush's popularity resulted in Democrats reclaiming the House and Senate in 2006 and nowhere more evident than in my home state of Virginia where Jim Webb, a former Reagan Navy Secretary and decorated Vietnam War veteran, defeated GOP incumbent and presumed presidential candidate George Allen.

But this year's long and bitter drive to the left in gaining the Democratic presidential nomination is driving Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama into the box from which the eventual nominee will find his or herself hard to climb out of to tack back to the center against a somewhat unorthodox GOP nominee in Sen. John McCain. They'll need those Reagan Democrats in November and Obama's comments before a crowd given to view religious faith, firearm ownership and concerns about illegal immigration as would a high-born English gentleman view one of Senator Webb's Scots-Irish forebears from southwest Virginia is not promising for their prospects if he is the nominee. Combine that with his long-standing personal association with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and it's a GOP strategist's dream scenario.

  • 42 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
64
29
5.1
{"commentId":1689237,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

Bill:

So what the difference between all that and Leo Strauss?

{"commentId":1689237,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:58 AM EDT
{"commentId":1692464,"authorDomain":"ffeineandsugar"}

Actually, I was looking for a third quote beneath JC and BO. Preferably something from either Iron John or from Jack Handey. Either would've been soooo apropos.....

{"commentId":1692464,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"ffeineandsugar"}
  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:58 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":1689315,"authorDomain":"keggerlord-1"}

Strauss was more focused on the concept of liberalism degenerating into a form of moral relativism that discounts the idea that there can be "moral imperative". Obama's form of liberalism, instead, views the concepts of values as something you cling to in desperation (i.e. - that there is a feeling of despair that is placated by ideologies with traditional roots. Sadly, his faux pas was to lump those positive attributes of tradition (i.e. - religion, faith in the bill of rights) with aberrant ones (such as racism and xenophobia). The implication of his remarks is that he considers people who cling to any set of beliefs, positive or negative, as doing so because they are unable to rationalize the situation (and there is an underlying tone that his own mental prowess prevents him from doing likewise, thereby giving an "elitist" distinction to his thought process over the "common man").

Time will tell if this will be a damning remark for him, particularly in this highly polarized political race. Personally, I don't think the man should be critiqued on the basis of this one sound bite. It was an unfortunate gaff, but it was only one remark. My personal reasons voting for him go to more toward his policy focuses, namely universal health care and corporate governance. I also don't like the idea of his foreign policy practices (i.e. - that we should start a dialogue with the myriad of hostile governments who actively act against our national interests). However, there are aspects of his beliefs that I would like to see considered by either McCain or Clinton, if either are elected, such as his views on conservation and an energy policy that has to consider national interests while leaving the smallest possible impact on the environment (a policy that I believe McCain would be better with than Clinton).

{"commentId":1689315,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"keggerlord-1"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:24 AM EDT
{"commentId":1689575,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

Jay:

The implication of his remarks is that he considers people who cling to any set of beliefs, positive or negative, as doing so because they are unable to rationalize the situation .... [emphasis added]

Where do you get the "any"? I read the transcript and it seemed to me he was very specifically talking about the Republican party's cynical exploitation of the culturally conservative iconic issues of "God, Guns and Gays" to keep white proletarians voting against their own political-economic interests.

{"commentId":1689575,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 6 votes
#2.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:28 AM EDT
{"commentId":1689658,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

Jack - "...exploitation..."

Saying that people are so stupid to be exploited, people who themselves say they are being exploited, is somehow elitist.

{"commentId":1689658,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
  • 2 votes
#2.2 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:49 AM EDT
{"commentId":1689704,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

Cletus:

Yeah? So? Not saying it is to yield to exploitation anyway so what difference does it make? Saying it at least lays the groundwork for a more general recognition of the phenomena .

Fact is, the Republicans are never going to overturn Roe v. Wade and the Democrats are never going to overturn the 2nd Amendment.

I know that, you know it, Jay K knows it, lilorphant knows it, gbudavid knows it, Bill knows it, Blaise knows it, Yussef knows it, Bill Kristol knows it, Hillary Clinton knows it, John McCain knows it, Barack Obama knows it and most of the audience to whom Obama was speaking knows it.

When enough of the public knows it, things will change.

{"commentId":1689704,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 7 votes
#2.3 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:04 AM EDT
{"commentId":1689731,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

Jack- "Yeah? So? ..."

My one liners are frequently lacking. With the 'somehow' word, I was trying to demonstrate that their elitist claim here is really reaching.

{"commentId":1689731,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
  • 2 votes
#2.4 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:11 AM EDT
{"commentId":1689746,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

Cletus:

Oooops. Sorry.

Oh well, got a good comment out of it at least.

{"commentId":1689746,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 2 votes
#2.5 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:14 AM EDT
{"commentId":1689766,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

Yes, you did.

I liked Kristol's article. Not all of his conclusions, of course, but I'm reading Audacity of Hope, and he sounds pretty big on NAFTA in the section I'm reading. The GOP is trying to make a big deal about Obama's expressed desire to amend it. I don't see it as a contradiction.

{"commentId":1689766,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
  • 1 vote
#2.6 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:21 AM EDT
{"commentId":1690480,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}

Jack - 2.1 - not all "white proletariats" believe that the democratic party is best able to save them from themselves....and not all "white proletariats" believe that bigger government programs are the solution to every economic woe.

{"commentId":1690480,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
  • 7 votes
#2.7 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:59 PM EDT
{"commentId":1690527,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}
Fact is, the Republicans are never going to overturn Roe v. Wade and the Democrats are never going to overturn the 2nd Amendment.

Jack - 2.3 - but the President has a major impact on which supreme court judges make it to the bench.....judges that favor for example partial birth abortion (vote Obama!); judges who may weaken 2nd amendment rights.....etc etc. Cultural issues in this country much to the chagrin of elitist liberals like barack obama DO MATTER because we love our country, our consitution and the moral values on which this great nation was founded....and it is the GOP ---more specifically conservative elements of the GOP that best aligns with these concerns shared by millions of Americans---what the dems like to denigrate by calling "wedge" issues.

{"commentId":1690527,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
  • 7 votes
#2.8 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:10 PM EDT
{"commentId":1690597,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

lisa:

not all "white proletariats" believe that the democratic party is best able to save them from themselves....and not all "white proletariats" believe that bigger government programs are the solution to every economic woe.

I completely and totally agree. I don't even mind if Obama loses as long as he makes the case. If I didn't think he could win by making the case, I would not support him--what I'm saying is, I don't mind losing so much if my case is made in the process.

I can live with a Presaident McCain for four years if I have to in those circumstances. What I hate is having to live with it if the best case isn't made for my position because my party is all tying itself in knots worried about these shallow and self-defeating tactical manuevers.

{"commentId":1690597,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 4 votes
#2.9 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:24 PM EDT
{"commentId":1690605,"authorDomain":"youssef51"}
concerns shared by millions of Americans

That's the whole point, lisaed.

Large numbers of US citizens have been duped through commercial and "news" overload into focusing disproportionately on issues that are relatively harmless for the people and organizations actually calling the shots.

What you call "concerns" are actually nothing but a side show in the big Carny. Abortion is a non-issue, gun rights are a non-issue, "out-of-control" crime is a non-issue, assisted suicide is a non-issue, illegal immigration is a non-issue. Please note that I'm talking about the real future of the country, not the imaginations of a lot of PR consultants and lobbyists at work creating all the misunderstandings and old wives tales that people love to believe and complain about. That's entertainment, not reality.

And that's one of the real big issues. The US is losing its way. People are losing their critical senses after decades of assault by mindless consumerism and the "concerns" of the GOP. I think most Americans would agree with me that something is badly wrong and not just with the economy. This has nothing whatever to do with any "wedge" and has nothing to do with any "elite", it has to do with education and the simple fact that the US is reaping the reward of decades of sub-decent public schooling.

People don't read, can't listen carefully to things that are "difficult" and instantly flee into a make believe land of angelic guardians and conversations with the dear departed. They believe in talking snakes. They believe that the world is less than 10,000 years old.

You seem quite happy with this state of affairs. I think you should be very worried.

{"commentId":1690605,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"youssef51"}
  • 7 votes
#2.10 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:28 PM EDT
{"commentId":1690608,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

lisa:

but the President has a major impact on which supreme court judges make it to the bench..

Doesn't matter. I've heard that same argument for TWENTY-EIGHT years and 7 of the 9 justices are Republican-appointed and it still hasn't happened.

Elite Republicans do not want Roe v. Wade overturned, and that includes McCain. If he has to, he'll name a pro-Choicer (although he's more likely to name a "moderate" pro-Lifer who magically becomes the fifth vote as has happened repeatedly over the last 28 years).

{"commentId":1690608,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 3 votes
#2.11 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:29 PM EDT
{"commentId":1690795,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}
I completely and totally agree.

Jack - 2.9 - in all honesty it's a thrill for yours truly - the charming conservative- whenever you agree with me--especially when it's "completely and totally".......this coming from my favorite lib - as I recall you used to refer to your commentary on your column as "elite", no?

{"commentId":1690795,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
  • 5 votes
#2.12 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
{"commentId":1690799,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}

Jack -2.11- I'm not so worried about McCain getting elected and overturning Roe V. Wade as I am Obama getting elected and choosing SCOTUS judges who do not support life....and when your candidate is out there saying things like "punish with a baby" it does get pro-life types all up in a frenzy......those people were never going to vote for Obama ---but they also may no longer be so luke warm re: McCain when a vote for McCain becomes more a vote against Obama.

{"commentId":1690799,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
  • 6 votes
#2.13 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:26 PM EDT
{"commentId":1690862,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

lisa:

Yup. "Liberal Socialist Elite Commentary." There is a difference between "elite" and "elitist," though.

:^{)>

Speaking of pro-Lifers, you going to Mass at Yankee stadium?

{"commentId":1690862,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 3 votes
#2.14 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:44 PM EDT
{"commentId":1690932,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}

Jack 2.14- Unfortunately, no, I won't be going to Yankee stadium for mass but feel quite blessed as I know I've mentioned before to have been at the Vatican for Pope Benedict's first Palm Sunday mass....it was an enormous thrill I will never forget.

{"commentId":1690932,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
  • 6 votes
#2.15 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
{"commentId":1690976,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

lisa:

At least watch out for traffic and such. If you've ever around when any President is in town .... this is ten times worse.

{"commentId":1690976,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 3 votes
#2.16 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:17 PM EDT
{"commentId":1691923,"authorDomain":"geejay"}

Isn't McCain also for keeping Roe v. Wade?

{"commentId":1691923,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"geejay"}
  • 1 vote
#2.17 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:58 PM EDT
{"commentId":1692064,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

TJG:

He was. But now he's not.

He's riding the Crooked Talk Local.

{"commentId":1692064,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
  • 1 vote
#2.18 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:45 PM EDT
{"commentId":1692076,"authorDomain":"geejay"}

At least Obama sticks to his beliefs.

{"commentId":1692076,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"geejay"}
  • 1 vote
#2.19 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:48 PM EDT
{"commentId":1694105,"authorDomain":"frankblack"}

You sound like one of them there elitists boy.

{"commentId":1694105,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"frankblack"}
    #2.20 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:29 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1694163,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}
    He's riding the Crooked Talk Local.

    Jack -2.18- now now - aren't you being a tad disingenous with TJG here? I thought you and I already established yesterday that McCain will not overturn Roe V. Wade.....

    {"commentId":1694163,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.21 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:44 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1694192,"authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}

    lisa:

    Oh, I do believe that. But he's going try to leave a false impression otherwise. That be Crooked Talk.

    {"commentId":1694192,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jfxgillis"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.22 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:51 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":1689369,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

    Thanks Bill, I see much similarity with the 'Bitter' complaint and the hullabaloo over the 'Malaise' speech. Another good example of ignoring the main points of a speech, and focusing on a few words oversensitive people like to worry about. Three quarters of the country think the nation is headed in the wrong direction, like they did when gas prices skyrocketed in the '70s, but how dare anyone suggests that we should be responsible for our own behaviour (addiction to imported oil).

    (it's a loose analogy, I admit, but it works for me)

    {"commentId":1689369,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#3 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:39 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1689431,"authorDomain":"youssef51"}

    Bill -

    Thanks for putting this into a historical context.

    My take:

    Whether Senator Obama's remark was a disaster or not remains to be seen. It's hard to say right now, but here's my take:

    I think you and a lot of others are in for a surprise. I think an astonishingly large share of US voters are going to realize that although Obama's comment may have sounded impolitic, it was entirely true.

    You take it for granted that it was insulting and elitist. I think you are wrong on both counts. I think a lot of people in Western Pennsylvania are fully aware of the difference between impolitic and wrong.

    {"commentId":1689431,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"youssef51"}
    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:56 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1689670,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    Well, we'll see about that. I could be wrong but I don't think I am. I think that Obama's having grown up outside the continental U.S. has given him something of a tin ear for national politics as it's played in this country which is something I hadn't fully considered until I heard John Heilemann of New York magazine talking about it this morning while I was eating breakfast and reading the papers. Bill Clinton, or even Gore (who grew up in the old Fairfax Hotel) for that matter, would never have said anything remotely close to this.

    And his remarks aren't even particularly true insofar as the economy of Pennsylvania is concerned as anyone who's visited the environs of Pittsburgh and Allegheny County can attest. The "new economy" there is doing quite well despite years of know-nothingism on the part of the steelworkers unions which only delayed the inevitable and made things worse.

    {"commentId":1689670,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 5 votes
    #4.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:53 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1690309,"authorDomain":"gpnavonod"}
    And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustration."

    Maybe his Barackness means ... Like when he was under fire how he clung to and is still clinging to his Pastor's strange and novel Religion ...that has a "justified" antipathy toward people like the Small town, PA. "Typicals"?

    Maybe if they could join his church and hear a few sermons about "Typicals", like he did didn't,... they wouldn't have to be so unjustifiably "Bitter"? They might even wanna turn in their guns at the church door.

    {"commentId":1690309,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"gpnavonod"}
    • 5 votes
    #4.2 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1690599,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    The type of attitude exhibited by Obama in his remarks is what drives Democratic strategists like Mudcat Saunders to distraction in his and others attempts to get the party back on track with voters down South in presidential races.

    If Obama's the nominee he probably just delivered PA to McCain this fall.

    {"commentId":1690599,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 3 votes
    #4.3 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:26 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1690611,"authorDomain":"youssef51"}
    If Obama's the nominee he probably just delivered PA to McCain this fall.

    Polishing the Old Crystal Ball, Bill?

    Bookmarked for future reference!

    {"commentId":1690611,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"youssef51"}
    • 1 vote
    #4.4 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:31 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1691312,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    Note the qualifier.

    For the record, while I would never have voted for Obama in the general election under any circumstances unless the GOP had gone completely insane and nominated Huckabee the more I've examined this guy the less I like him.

    I can abide a fraud. Most politicians are. What I can't abide is a pious one.

    {"commentId":1691312,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 6 votes
    #4.5 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:42 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1692882,"authorDomain":"abbi"}

    I totally agree with #4.5---Barack Obama is a pious fraud who does not really connect with mainstream middle class America when he is not reciting from his political script. I am a lifetime democrat who did not vote for Obama in the primary because I have more confidence in Hillary Clinton. If Hillary Clinton does not win as the democratic nominee, I will switch to John McCain in the general election because I don't trust Barack Obama's leadership. I think John McCain will move towards the center in the general election which is why he will appeal to most Independents. Obama has copied John Edwards' and Hillary Clinton's ideas on the issues, so why vote for Obama. I don't think Obama is genuine and I don't trust him. All I heard from Obama in the beginning of the campaign was his version of Dr. Martin Luther King's inspirational speech and saying he was going to "Change" Washington. After he realized he needed more substance on issues to sell himself is when he started copying John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.

    {"commentId":1692882,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"abbi"}
    • 1 vote
    #4.6 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:42 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1693088,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

    "more substance on issues"

    That's the mantra, but from what I read he has more substance than any of the other candidates. I'm saying this based on comparisons of the candidates websites where their platforms are laid out. (Also, from the book Audacity of Hope.

    The response from GOPers i that he should be saying this stuff in his speeches. Maybe he does? How would we know based on what the media reports?

    {"commentId":1693088,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
    • 1 vote
    #4.7 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:34 AM EDT
    {"commentId":1694185,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}
    What I can't abide is a pious one.

    Bill - 4.5 - Agreed.....and it's when he is under fire that Obama's nose-in-the-air piety best comes out---if he wins the nomination - as I'm sure he will - I think we're going to get to see that far less appealing side of Obama a lot more frequently than we have heretofore.

    {"commentId":1694185,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
    • 2 votes
    #4.8 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:50 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1694302,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

    Obama's got substance alright -- just check your wallet first.

    {"commentId":1694302,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
    • 1 vote
    #4.9 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:19 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1694338,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

    That's fair criticism, Bill.

    Let's compare

    {"commentId":1694338,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
      #4.10 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1694665,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

      Clete, Bush and the 109th Congress aren't on the the ballot this year. In the interest of fair play though I must admit I didn't much care for what I heard coming out of Romney's mouth this a.m. on MorningJoe on McCain's economic plan.

      {"commentId":1694665,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
      • 1 vote
      #4.11 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:46 PM EDT
      {"commentId":1694706,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

      How does McCain propose to pay for continuing the war?

      {"commentId":1694706,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
        #4.12 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:59 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":1689526,"authorDomain":"lilorphant"}

        http://www.ruralreality.org/campaign/report/rural_facts.html

        From the Center For Rural Strategies:

        Of the 250 poorest counties in the United States, 244 are rural.

        Rural households earn an average of 27 percent less than their metropolitan counterparts. The rural poverty rate is 21 percent higher than the metropolitan poverty rate.

        In 1996-98 the suicide rate for males over 15 years of age was nearly 80 percent higher in rural areas than in large metropolitan counties.

        Rural areas have about half the number of physicians per capita as urban areas.

        Drug use among young teens is significantly higher in rural than in urban America. Rural eighth graders, for example, are 104 percent likelier to use amphetamines and 83 percent likelier to use crack cocaine.

        Spending in rural school districts is 25 percent less per pupil than in metropolitan districts.

        Nearly 40 percent of the rural population does not have access to public transportation. More than half of the rural poor do not own automobiles.

        Ninety percent of farm families' income is derived from non-farm sources, such as another job. Manufacturing, services, and other industry dominate seven out of eight rural counties.

        {"commentId":1689526,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lilorphant"}
        • 1 vote
        Reply#5 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:17 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689599,"authorDomain":"youssef51"}

        These are very important observations and a much needed compliment to this discussion.

        In 1996-98 the suicide rate for males over 15 years of age was nearly 80 percent higher in rural areas than in large metropolitan counties.

        This is, of course, directly correlated to the odds that there is at least one firearm in the household. The rule of thumb is that in most regions of the US the presence of a gun in the household correlates with an increase in the risk of a male in the household committing suicide by a factor of 50:1.

        This statement isn't elitist, either, although it might be very uncomfortable to think about. It's simply true.

        {"commentId":1689599,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"youssef51"}
        • 5 votes
        #5.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:32 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1691166,"authorDomain":"gpnavonod"}

        These are very important observations and a much needed compliment to this discussion.

        In 1996-98 the suicide rate for males over 15 years of age was nearly 80 percent higher in rural areas than in large metropolitan counties. This is, of course, directly correlated to the odds that there is at least one firearm in the household. The rule of thumb is that in most regions of the US the presence of a gun in the household correlates with an increase in the risk of a male in the household committing suicide by a factor of 50:1.

        This statement isn't elitist, either, although it might be very uncomfortable to think about. It's simply true.

        Yea ,it's also true that in urban areas most of those males are killed by driveby shootings and gang violence...not having the option to take their own lives.

        Likewise, the odds are that most urban guns are illegal and on the streets...and not in the home....making you feel safer there [home]......although it may be "uncomfortable" to think about sitting by a window.

        {"commentId":1691166,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"gpnavonod"}
        • 3 votes
        #5.2 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:05 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":1689591,"authorDomain":"gbudavid"}

        I am not voting for either of these folks. I read my Bible and go Hunting and Fishing every chance I get.

        {"commentId":1689591,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"gbudavid"}
        • 4 votes
        Reply#6 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:31 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689624,"authorDomain":"youssef51"}

        Just curious: Is that what you are basing your stand on? Your Bible and your Guns?

        {"commentId":1689624,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"youssef51"}
        • 1 vote
        #6.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:37 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1690478,"authorDomain":"gbudavid"}

        Yep. The Bible and Hunting and fishing

        {"commentId":1690478,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"gbudavid"}
        • 3 votes
        #6.2 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:59 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":1689614,"authorDomain":"blai"}

        Obama speaks the plain truth. Americans have been misled into outrage, an easy emotion to summon up, the easiest of all.

        Why worry about the Second Amendment? Because your gun is tangible. Don't worry about the Fourth Amendment, your telephone switch. That's not in your house. That's in some plain brick building in a place you'll never see.

        Why worry about your job disappearing into Mexico, or illegal aliens? Because you can see them, down at the cut-rate Aldi store, or in their local grocery. Don't worry about the parent corporation, which wants to move your job to China, so someone can do it for a tenth of your salary. Down in Bentonville Arkansas, the corporate warlords at Wal*Mart have already decided to outsource your job. They're not the problem. The illegal alien is the problem, the same hard-luck immigrant your grandfather once was, fresh off the boat, when this country still needed cheap labor, when this country tolerated the migration of peoples.

        Why worry about the @!$%#ty school your kid attends? Blame the teachers' union for trying to earn a living wage and have some authority over their own classroom, they're all incompetent graduates of second-rate colleges, taking the jobs nobody with a decent degree from a first-rate would possibly want. Yeah, blame the teachers. They're obvious targets. Want a decent education for your kid? Want a government-approved education for your kid? Try Lilywhite Christian Academy: they'll teach your kid the Flintstones really did have dinosaurs to vacuum their floors.

        It's like Penn and Teller. Classic misdirection. They'll even tell you how the trick works, and you're still as stupid as ever, your eyes move away from the sleight of hand. You know goddamn well that ace of spades is somehow marked in the deck, yet you'll be So Surprised to see the magician find it again.

        Should we worry about the Second Amendment right to bear arms, or Wal*Mart forcing its suppliers offshore, or the plague of illegal aliens or crappy schools? Sure we should. Just don't tell me my Fourth Amendment rights aren't under assault. When a politician says Trust Me, I feel around for my wallet. I'm sick of the Bush Administration lying to me, saying Trust Me, then proving untrustworthy. If there's any elitism going on here, I'll take Obama's sort over the conniving and fearmongering of the Bush Administration which hides its f*ckups under the blanket of National Security and Executive Privilege. They can't even manage the sleight-of-hand required to pull a coin from a child's ear. If you're gonna tell me a lie, make sure you can make me believe it, and make the story stick. Alberto Gonzales and Dick Cheney should be in jail, this very instant.

        This country is so stupid, it really does deserve this sort of talk. Obama isn't putting anyone down, he's calling them like he sees them.

        {"commentId":1689614,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"blai"}
        • 15 votes
        Reply#7 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:34 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689635,"authorDomain":"youssef51"}

        Excellent.

        Really, what more is there to say about this?

        they'll teach your kid the Flintstones really did have dinosaurs to vacuum their floors.

        This would be even more hilarious if it weren't true. Kills some of the joke, I'd say.

        {"commentId":1689635,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"youssef51"}
        • 3 votes
        #7.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:41 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689673,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

        BlaiseP -

        You do this so well, damn, I'm jealous.

        {"commentId":1689673,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
        • 2 votes
        #7.2 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:54 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689686,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
        This country is so stupid, it really does deserve this sort of talk.

        ROTFLMAO. It's this kind of attitude from Democrats that has ensured their near permanent exclusion from the White House now for going on a generation and a half. Please, let's do hear more of it. I'm also curious as to what his Barackness would think of the nation's 18th-richest county's attitude to illegal immigration. All beaten down hillbillies in Prince William County?

        {"commentId":1689686,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
        • 9 votes
        #7.3 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:58 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689780,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

        "It's this kind of attitude from Democrats that has ensured their near permanent exclusion..."

        Come off of it, GOPers have been calling Dem voters stupid for a long time too.

        {"commentId":1689780,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
        • 2 votes
        #7.4 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:24 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689807,"authorDomain":"johniequest"}

        The more Obama talks the more you see who the man really is.....

        First...he was referring to small town America.....in case you some of you don't realize it, thats code word for White people..... Middle Class, Lower Middle Class and Po' White folk. It'd take a blind man not to see that ( no disrespect intended towards the visually impaired )

        Second...the connotation of the word "clinging" is negative, all the clean up effort Obama can muster cannot change the connotation of that word. Whenever the term "cling" is used it infers insecurity i.e security blankets and teddy bears or clingy people

        Third...Religion is not something people cling to because of negative reasons but something they embrace because of the value it adds to our lives...all of us, Black White White and rich. When disaster comes and problems beset us, if anything the challenge is holding on to our faith despite the storms of our lives, not blaming God. Examples of that could be seen post Katrina...were people clinging or were they praying hoping and believing?

        Fourth....People are not upset with illegal immigration as a result of being bitter about their own lives but rather because illegal immigration is having a real and dynamic impact on our nations cities ...far more than it has on small town America. The school system and the Health Care systems are tremendously overburdened in Southern California. Martin Luther King County Hospital, a hospital in the Black Community was shut down with a big part of the reason being that it was too overburdened to run effectively. Overburdened by massive amounts of illegal immigrants. My wife, qualified and hardworking and efficient as she is could not get a permanent "office" position in any school in the LA School District simply because EVERY position has a bilingual requirement. Please note I said "office"....translated, that means not dealing with Spanish speaking students or their parents. Is that the fault of immigration or illegal immigrants?...No but it is the fault of over zealous over sensitive cow towing liberal politicians who enact policies to get votes and appear as do gooders

        Fifth - If honest citizens give up their guns, then only criminals will have them. Thats more of a big city problem than a small town one. In fact the 50+ deaths in the Chicago schools in the 1st 2 months of this year make any discussion of guns by Obama nothing more than pandering to social liberal extremists. Guns in fact have far more negative impact in the Black community than any small town in America on any day of the week notwithstanding the rare and horrific exceptions of Columbine, Virgina Tech and the like

        Conclusion- Obama along with his wife, are racists, functioning racists but nevertheless racists at heart. They faithfully attend a church where the messages even if not always, are too often racist in content and at the very least laden with racial overtones. The church invites Black Muslims as guest speakers. If you didn't know it already allow me to inform you that Black Muslim doctrine states that White people are devils, Jews are not to be trusted and Black people should be separate have their own land set apart as a Black nation here in America. This is why that church gave Farrakhan a lifetime achievement award obviously they believe in many of the same things.

        No matter how you slice it, if you slice it as I just have...the two terms stand on their own merit "small town" and "clinging" are dead giveaways of what he really meant...And to make those comments in San Francisco... what better place would there be for him to be relaxed enough to express the frustration of his heart due to the tremendous pressure he feels in his efforts to appeal to small town America. Amidst a group of San Fransican ultra liberals where those comments play right into extremist liberal sentiments....Obama felt right at home and got a little too relaxed. He must've thought he was at Trinity :-)

        No doubt about it.....Obama's remarks were condescending and showed what he really thinks about White people

        {"commentId":1689807,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"johniequest"}
        • 7 votes
        #7.5 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:34 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689881,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

        The first post-"Bitter" poll is now in and it ain't good for Barack as Hillary blows out to a 20 pt. lead in PA.

        "Beer for my horses, a shot of whiskey for my girl."

        {"commentId":1689881,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
        • 5 votes
        #7.6 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:49 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689898,"authorDomain":"youssef51"}

        You post is shot through with misunderstandings and half-truths that glide over into deceptions.

        People are not upset with illegal immigration as a result of being bitter about their own lives

        That is precisely why most people who are "bitter" about immigration are upset. Not all, most.

        {"commentId":1689898,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"youssef51"}
        • 2 votes
        #7.7 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:51 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1690029,"authorDomain":"blai"}

        I dunno, Bill. Las Vegas and Worshigtoon Dee Cee prove magicians can draw in the rubes like nothing else in town. Both are towns based on the proposition What is Seen is far more important than What is Known. And like the aircraft pulling up landing gear after a run down 27 Left out of McCarran Innernashunal Airport, full of freshly shorn human sheep, the Republican Party is full of idiots intent on repeating their mistakes as soon as they've got some more money in the credit cards.

        If we really must examine this matter of Attitudes, look at the idiots who voted for these Republicans. A repeated lie flashed in Hi-Def on a marquee is a far more effective than a metric ton of statistics showing the house always wins. The Republicans have been comping drinks and rooms with Tax Cuts, showing what Great Hosts they are. A happy drunk goes on believing right up until his credit card is declined. Then the Repubs will talk about Personal Responsibility, yes sir, and he'll walk back to McCarran.

        Yes, what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, and the Republican Rube is proof positive this country has always preferred the glitzy lie to uncomfortable truths. And that's not just this generation, Bill. Every Conservative in this country, without exception, has been kissing unwashed ass since the era of Reagan. Show them the facts, and they'll cling to their idiocy ever tighter, screaming Jack Booted Thugs are Comin' to Take Mah Guns Away and Get Them Mexicans Off the Porch. I would hate to think you could be lumped into this camp, for you exhibit so much common sense in other areas. Why does this glaring deficiency emerge in your thinking?

        The Turks have a saying: Doğru söyleyeni dokuz köyden kovarlar.. The man who tells the truth is exiled from nine villages. That proverb goes back centuries to the Ottoman Empire. It's as true today as ever, and it will be true for centuries to come.

        {"commentId":1690029,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"blai"}
        • 5 votes
        #7.8 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:19 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1690230,"authorDomain":"galley-cat"}

        Charles-254901, WOW, you said it right in every paragraph, spot-on. These statements are especially true:

        First...he was referring to small town America.....in case you some of you don't realize it, thats code word for White people..... Middle Class, Lower Middle Class and Po' White folk.

        Amidst a group of San Fransican ultra liberals where those comments play right into extremist liberal sentiments....Obama felt right at home and got a little too relaxed. He must've thought he was at Trinity :-)

        No doubt about it.....Obama's remarks were condescending and showed what he really thinks about White people

        In all the comments I've made in the past few days against His ASSumed Holiness Obama, I have wanted to state what you said, in essence, and never got around to it, but you are absolutely right that when he says "small town America" he is referring to us "pathetic" white people.

        God help his wretched soul if he so easily forgets that when he was sent home from Indonesia by his flaming liberal mom, it was his white American grandparents who sent him to the elite and very expensive Punahou Prep School. But wait, no, all he remembers (or publicly acknowledges) about his grandma is her one little comment that sometimes black guys passing her on the street make her nervous. He disgusts me thoroughly.

        Thanks for your clarity and boldness!

        {"commentId":1690230,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"galley-cat"}
        • 4 votes
        #7.9 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:00 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1690333,"authorDomain":"johniequest"}

        Thanks....I'm just tired of people painting this guy like he's some kind of perfect savior. Especially when you line all the facts up and see them for what they are.

        Citing his church as a typical Black church...that nonsense broke the camels back as far as I'm concerned.

        I took that as not only a lie but a stereotypical racist type casting of Black people and I truly and deeply resent it.

        Black muslims are not welcomed to give messages in typical black churches. Devout Christians don't reward Black Muslim bigotry no more than a white church should reward David Duke.
        Pastors don't curse America and use God's name in vain in typical Black churches.

        And he should be ashamed to say that typical white women are scared of black people.

        Too many lies and contradictions for my taste..... therefore I see an Obama presidency as a problem for not only Black people but for the People.

        {"commentId":1690333,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"johniequest"}
        • 4 votes
        #7.10 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:24 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1690789,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

        Blaise

        "There you go again." When Ronald Reagan died, tens of thousands of people lined up in sweltering heat to pay their respects here nearly crippling Metro. No such expressions of public grief will be forthcoming when Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton leave this mortal coil.

        Now for another little bit of history, when the GOP Congress proposed a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution in 1995 it failed by precisely one vote. And that vote didn't come from a Republican. It came from Kent Conrad who continued with the time-honored Democratic demagoguery on the entitlements to ensure its defeat.

        Obama's platform (at least from examining it from his website) promises a cornucopia of government spending for everyone and everybody paid for by higher taxes on such people as the wealthy dual-income GS-16s of the greater DC area.

        But to make a long story short, I objected strenuosly to George Bush's and the 109th Congress's fiscal profligacy but not even Obama would do away with all of the Bush tax cuts. Figures lie, liars figure and politicians love spending other people's money but the driver of the fiscal trainwreck in this country are the entitlements and neither party, especially the Democrats, wants to do much about that signal little fact especially after what happened to Bush the last time out.

        In the end I guess it all comes down to what kind of country one wants to live in. Personally, I'd like to save the US from becoming another imitation of Europe with its high taxes, generous welfare state and inability to defend itself absent a large friend for as long as possible.

        {"commentId":1690789,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
        • 5 votes
        #7.11 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:24 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1690941,"authorDomain":"blai"}

        Let us pretend, in the interests of avoiding endless repetition, that I have again given my stump speech about Ronald Reagan's treachery and shallowness in that little matter of selling arms to Iran, then and now the greatest threat to America since Communism. Suffice to say Joe Stalin was sincerely mourned by the citizenry of the Soviet Union. Like Reagan, Stalin destroyed his country in the interests of saving it. America would get its hangover during the administration of Bush the Wiser after Reagan's colossal fiscal toot. That old fraud set in motion much we see today, and his deputies obscenely reappeared in the current Bush Administration, notably Elliot Abrams, who should be in the next cell over from Aldrich Ames instead of running ME policy for State.

        I wouldn't know about calling Obama a Big Tax and Spender just yet. That's the purview of the Congress, which may find it more politically palatable to raise taxes on oil and pharma companies which prospered mightily under the current administration. He's also talking a good line on cracking down on offshore corporations, ever the darling of the Republicans. A Bonfire of the Vanities is in the offing: for every reaction there is an equal and opposite reaction.

        The Republicans are moral bankrupts. They are as I have described them, moreover may I add cowards and toadies to the list of epithets. They will not fight the war on terror, they have presided over the greatest moral decline in this nation's long history. It would not be quite so ignominious a tumble were it not for their Much Speaking on the subject of Morality and Fiscal Discipline.

        Yes, it does come down to what sort of country we wish to live in. When Truman proposed a national health care system, who should appear as the spokesman for the status quo? Yes, Ronald Reagan, warning us of the perils of Socialized Medicine.

        Fearmongers were they always, fearmongers are they now. Eventually, after enough terrification, any life form will exhaust the adrenaline and enter a form of shell shock and passivity. Republicans have depended on this phenomenon since that traitor Ronald Reagan first told us our own government was the enemy. In a perverse turn of fate, under the Republicans, our government has become the enemy, it spies on us, and revokes our Fourth Amendment rights. Don't say we weren't warned.

        {"commentId":1690941,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"blai"}
        • 4 votes
        #7.12 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:09 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1691510,"authorDomain":"RETLAW"}

        ugh

        {"commentId":1691510,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"RETLAW"}
        • 1 vote
        #7.13 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:55 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1691703,"authorDomain":"RETLAW"}

        BLAISE-#7--Never thought I'd agree with you, but I do !! 100% Amazing.

        And Charles---'small town' is a code word for 'small town' In case you haven't been through the south, southeast, or southwest, there are many, multiracial, mid & low income towns abounding there. Further, I don't believe at all that Obama or his wife are racists. But I do think that a higher percentage of blacks are racists (in a negative way) than are whites.

        Bill-thanks for beginning the discussion. I think that you are incorrect. And I think that you began this discussion just to bash Obama. Failed miserably.

        {"commentId":1691703,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"RETLAW"}
        • 4 votes
        #7.14 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:41 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1691710,"authorDomain":"juli54green"}

        Charles, re 7.10, and Bill 7.11, we are in complete agreement.

        Well stated, both of you. Good thoughts.

        {"commentId":1691710,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"juli54green"}
        • 2 votes
        #7.15 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:42 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1691777,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

        I second that ugh

        {"commentId":1691777,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
        • 1 vote
        #7.16 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:57 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1693099,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

        charles: "he was referring to small town America.....in case you some of you don't realize it, thats code word for White people."

        wasn't the question he was asked about, why small town America doesn't vote for him?

        True, he shoulda given a non-answer, SOP for politicians.

        {"commentId":1693099,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
        • 1 vote
        #7.17 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:37 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1694029,"authorDomain":"johniequest"}

        retlaw; 'small town' is a code word for 'small town'

        Everyone in the world except you seems to realize that Black voters mean Black voters whether they're in a small town, a suburb or a big city and "small town America" means small mostly white towns across the nation.

        Yet and still are the words "cling to their religion" just words?

        He can't escape of excuse the fact that It's the negative connotation of the word "clinging", a word which never denotes anything admirable or positive and always denotes neediness and insecurity that gives us the glimpse of the true intent of his comments.

        So how does a self proclaimed devout Christian call embracing one's faith clinging to religion.

        Add to that those comments were made in fronto of ultra liberal San Francisco fat cats to raise money...the man clearly just got too relaxed.

        True people are fed up not only in small towns but all over the nation but I submit to you He would have never made that particular statement in that manner were he actually in small town America, the way he made that statement in Frisco.

        Some of you need to quit making excuses for the man just as he needs to quit making excuses for his pastor. let them make their own excuses and give their own reasons for the words they say.

        But please remember, they're not "Just Words"

        {"commentId":1694029,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"johniequest"}
        • 1 vote
        #7.18 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:06 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":1689674,"authorDomain":"shell-ii-1"}

        Mr. Obama's comments suggests that rural families are the only jobless, gun carrying, bible toting, anti-immagrant people in the country. He should know that many rural families are ex-urban dwellers who prefer rural America to city life. This is another way to say that because they do not support him they are uneducated. This comment is ill-founded and very anti Martin L. King who believed that judging character is much more important. Once again, when he is called to task for his choices Mr. Obama plays the victim of racism. Consider this, Mr. Obama claims to be a Black man in America when he is truly an African in America. I cannot see this man as a native son. Obama supporters must acknowledge that Rev. Wright's 20 years of influence has rubbed off on him and the chickens have come home to roost.

        {"commentId":1689674,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"shell-ii-1"}
        • 3 votes
        Reply#8 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:54 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1689694,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

        "Mr. Obama's comments suggests that rural families are the only jobless, gun carrying, bible toting, anti-immagrant people in the country."

        ?

        If I say "The Fascists are idiots", that doesn't necessarily suggest that the Communists aren't also idiots. (For example)

        {"commentId":1689694,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
          #8.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:01 AM EDT
          {"commentId":1689726,"authorDomain":"shell-ii-1"}

          No, but the point is that you just lumped all of them together and said that they all believe for the same reason.

          {"commentId":1689726,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"shell-ii-1"}
          • 1 vote
          #8.2 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:10 AM EDT
          {"commentId":1689788,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

          "... you just lumped all of them together and said that they all believe for the same reason."

          I wasn't trying to. There are multiple reasons for being an idiot.

          {"commentId":1689788,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
          • 1 vote
          #8.3 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:26 AM EDT
          Reply
          {"commentId":1689926,"authorDomain":"jgschlegel"}

          If you want to quote a person..kindly Quote the entire statement.
          Let people make up their own minds on the meaning of the words.

          Transcript of Obama's Remarks at San Francisco Fundraiser SundayOBAMA: So, it depends on where you are, but I think it's fair to say that the places where we are going to have to do the most work are the places where people are most cynical about government. The people are mis-appre…they're misunderstanding why the demographics in our, in this contest have broken out as they are. Because everybody just ascribes it to 'white working-class don't wanna work — don't wanna vote for the black guy.' That's…there were intimations of that in an article in the Sunday New York Times today - kind of implies that it's sort of a race thing.

          Here's how it is: in a lot of these communities in big industrial states like Ohio and Pennsylvania, people have been beaten down so long. They feel so betrayed by government that when they hear a pitch that is premised on not being cynical about government, then a part of them just doesn't buy it. And when it's delivered by — it's true that when it's delivered by a 46-year-old black man named Barack Obama, then that adds another layer of skepticism.

          But — so the questions you're most likely to get about me, 'Well, what is this guy going to do for me? What is the concrete thing?' What they wanna hear is so we'll give you talking points about what we're proposing — to close tax loopholes, uh you know uh roll back the tax cuts for the top 1%, Obama's gonna give tax breaks to uh middle-class folks and we're gonna provide healthcare for every American.

          But the truth is, is that, our challenge is to get people persuaded that we can make progress when there's not evidence of that in their daily lives. You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

          Um, now these are in some communities, you know. I think what you'll find is, is that people of every background — there are gonna be a mix of people, you can go in the toughest neighborhoods, you know working-class lunch-pail folks, you'll find Obama enthusiasts. And you can go into places where you think I'd be very strong and people will just be skeptical. The important thing is that you show up and you're doing what you're doing.

          Peace John

          {"commentId":1689926,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"jgschlegel"}
          • 6 votes
          Reply#9 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:56 AM EDT
          {"commentId":1693126,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

          John,

          thank you. I've been looking for this.

          Where'd you get it from?

          {"commentId":1693126,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
            #9.1 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:45 AM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":1690237,"authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}

            Hi Bill,

            Always a pleasure to drop by your column as you drop by mine.

            I would postulate that Barack's comments stem from his education and not unreasonably so from his position in life. I am wont to participate in these discussions about what these Democratic politicians say but I would suggest that the conversation misses the innate problems faced with living in a capitalistic society. Many of the rural people's concern will only expand as globalization has been the watchword of wall street so much for the defense of New York city.

            If I had to blame anyone it would be Bill Clinton for pushing NAFTA and free trade which has done little to alleviate the lot of people who just want somewhere to go work and not too difficult a job and be able to raise their children and provide a better way of life through plain old hard work and time. Not through any sort of mental exercise. The promise that this would bring growth and prosperity to all the people was a misnomer and a slight of hand, let's reference the Penn and Teller joke above. When Bill talks about the "low hanging fruit" it's exactly what he means. Unfortunately this has led to a magnificent loss of jobs and an impossibility for them to make a decent living and almost no way for them to pull themselves up from their boot straps to make a go of it. I would be bitter too and don't blame them one bit, not everyone is cut out to excel at school or for that matter thinking at all.

            There is nothing that these politicians can do about it now, big business is how we got here and the only way to fix it is to retract their sway over politics. Remember when it used to be a requirement that corporations proved that they were a benefit to society before they could garner the title "corporation", after many years this is no longer the case as Delaware and Vegas really have no taxes to speak of and anyone can form a corporation in a day. It's pathetic and soul crushing to hear about their economic policies, did you know there was such a thing as "Mcainonomic's", it's ridiculous and panders to the dumbest of all of us. The solution is to put some controls on these boys and stop them from ruining our county. We don't need Walmart, we need regional, at best, corporations that play in their local communities. Not everyone needs to be or wants to be a Rhodes Scholar to participate in a community aside from the fact it makes them feel stupid and defensive about it.

            The fact is our next president will do little or nothing to help them, neither of them has what we would like to term real leadership qualities to take us down a road that helps everyone without a seachange in thinking, which neither of the candidates will be able to provide. I'm sick and tired of hearing about Obama's grandmother and minister, let's just get it over with and get the heck out of Iraq so we at least stop spending our money where it least needs to be and come up with some real ideas that could really make a difference, whatever that would be.

            Nice to Blaise be funny,

            Forest

            {"commentId":1690237,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}
            • 3 votes
            Reply#10 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
            {"commentId":1690859,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

            I don't know Forest. Actually the lot of the common peoople in the town I grew up in has been a lot better as the result of globalization over the past thirty years. Before, the poultry plants were all manned by locals. Now with the growth of the university and other businesses including big, bad pharma the poultry plants are mostly staffed by immigrants from Latin America with the native born having moved up.

            As for NAFTA, both Hillary and Obama are full of it.

            {"commentId":1690859,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
            • 3 votes
            #10.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:43 PM EDT
            {"commentId":1691577,"authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}

            Well Bill....how is the glass bubble? You are actually going to tell me that where you live everything has only gotten better since the 70's, horsepucky! In no manner fashion manner of form is it better. In the real world where most of us live real wages have gone down since the seventies not up and not once. Forgive my not living by you pal but most people can't agree with globalization being a better thing except perhaps China and in a more touching way India who are thrilled to take jobs that can be better performed here.

            There is also the chance that you perhaps don't understand that when we give the cheapest labor to these other countries they suffer for it. Over 200 million Chinese labor away at jobs that are literally killing them because they don't have an enforceable force to make sure the factories aren't run in such a way so as to poison them to death pal.

            We fix things here, make the products here locally and they can take care of their own, but when we entice them into manufacturing for us to their detriment how has that helped. Talk to me about a living wage, you know what that is Bill right? A reasonable wage for a reasonable days work so people can own a house, send their kids to college and retire comfortably. Ask yourself if that doesn't pay for the more local companies to charge more to the end user. The dollar would still be worth more, sorry that almost all of our growth comes from international business, mostly in third world countries, but the fact remains they don't need our business to become 1st tier countries, but rather just time.

            If I follow your line of thinking Bill I would clearly have stats for you about how many of our children are doing well in high school, and further and more importantly college. That's not really happening is it, and it's not happening because the jobs that all globalization pushers are talking about haven't been defined nor have they been for the last 30 years. Listen to businessmen from India expound to us the virtues of them doing our dirty work for us and listen to the irony in my voice. They expect us to come up with all new technology that everyone will need and that will create this utopia of jobs. It won't but it most certainly will make them stronger and us weaker in a fiscal and societal sense.

            This will be a blip in history in the near future as robots will finally take the load of any physical labor from us, but there is no need to participate in what is a human crisis to get there. You want to beware of someone Bill, make that Japan who has spent billions of dollars investing in what any critical thinker will be a business that dwarfs computers, watch for the commercial filmed inside one of their car dealerships with the car and Asimo in it, we will purchase them from there.

            Perhaps we could agree that we want to do as little damage along the way Bill and stop trying put global multinationals up on a pedestal where they most certainly don't belong. As far as I'm concerned you can take all these candidates and throw them away as none of them seems to have anything resembling vision only in what we would term as personal power and those kind of people worry me.

            Forest

            {"commentId":1691577,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}
            • 3 votes
            #10.2 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:14 PM EDT
            {"commentId":1691947,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
            You are actually going to tell me that where you live everything has only gotten better since the 70's, horsepucky! In no manner fashion manner of form is it better.

            Thank you Forest for telling me how things have changed in my hometown of which you know zilch. I can assure you that things are as I stated. In fact, you might want to plan a trip sometime to Virginia's Shenandoah Valley. It's quite beautiful. Just don't walk into a bar and tell some of the locals they'd be better off plucking chickens like they were back in the '70s. Some aren't as even-tempered as I am, "pal".

            {"commentId":1691947,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
            • 3 votes
            #10.3 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:10 PM EDT
            {"commentId":1691998,"authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}

            I lived in Virginia when my dad was stationed at Langley pal, but they still pluck chickens even here out in old Oregon, a considerable amount in fact. A large amount of them are Mexicans, but I see you missed my point completely Bill, are you saying that people who work on chicken farms are somehow inferior to you and your fellow Virginians.

            My point stands as usual with you Bill is that farms run to a higher standard, you know Bill free range chickens, done correctly and on a smaller scale creates healthier food, and healthier chickens. At the same time you can charge more because they are of a better quality and in that cost will be added a living wage. Simple Bill, perhaps you should read it slower.

            As to even tempered Virginians Bill why don't you just mosey on over to Oregon and find out what even tempered country boys are like. Oh and the Allegheny's are hills compared out here to where we have real mountains.

            {"commentId":1691998,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"ForestBrowne"}
            • 1 vote
            #10.4 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:24 PM EDT
            {"commentId":1693118,"authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}

            Forest: "Bill Clinton for pushing NAFTA"

            For the record: "NAFTA was initially pursued by politicians in the United States and Canada supportive of free trade, led by Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, U.S. President George H. W. Bush, and the Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari."

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement

            {"commentId":1693118,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"cletuswilbury"}
              #10.5 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:42 AM EDT
              {"commentId":1694317,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

              That's good Clete. Perhaps you can explain why Obama and Hillary are both full of crap on NAFTA to Gump.

              {"commentId":1694317,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
                #10.6 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
                Reply
                {"commentId":1690253,"authorDomain":"galley-cat"}

                By the way Bill, I love the title for this article! It should win some sort of Newsvine award :-D

                {"commentId":1690253,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"galley-cat"}
                • 5 votes
                Reply#11 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:04 PM EDT
                {"commentId":1690802,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

                Why thank you.

                {"commentId":1690802,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
                • 4 votes
                #11.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:27 PM EDT
                Reply
                {"commentId":1690461,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}

                Bill - it is the Reagan democrats who once again will decide this election----Obama has made much about his appeal to Obamicans ---but I never bought that for a minute. On the other hand - I think John McCain the maverick is going to be quite appealing to those Reagan Democrats - more so than an elitist who believes only the government knows what's best for the masses......

                {"commentId":1690461,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
                • 5 votes
                Reply#12 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:55 PM EDT
                {"commentId":1690823,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

                The irony of all this Lisa is, of course, that the remarks in question came at a fundraiser Obama was holding in San Francisco. That crowd would no doubt view anyone with religious belief or devotion to hunting and owning firearms as some kind of exotic lower class rustic which brings to mind Jonah Goldberg's comment on how the New York Times would headline its story when Dale Earnhardt Sr. was killed -- Cracker Icon Killed in Bizarre Folk Ritual.

                Obama was playing to the crowd (he never would have made such a remark in PA) and the sneaky Mayhew Fowler from HuffPo caught him at it. It may, in fact, become His Baracksness's "macaca" moment.

                {"commentId":1690823,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
                • 4 votes
                #12.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:32 PM EDT
                {"commentId":1690939,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}
                It may, in fact, become His Baracksness's "macaca" moment.

                Bill Harrison 12.1- Yes - it may well be. The day's of the "closed" fundraiser are over....and barack should have been smart enough to know that.

                {"commentId":1690939,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
                • 3 votes
                #12.2 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:09 PM EDT
                {"commentId":1691931,"authorDomain":"geejay"}

                You're dreaming if you think any Democrat, sick of the direction of this country, will vote for more of the same with McCain. He might have been a 'maverick' in 2000, but not so much anymore. He's kowtowed to Bush.

                {"commentId":1691931,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"geejay"}
                  #12.3 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:01 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":1694200,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}

                  TJG 12.3 - democrats may not vote for McCain in large numbers (though I do think Reagan dems may indeed find him more appealing than radical leftist Obama)- but remember it's those pesky independents who will determine this election WILL.

                  {"commentId":1694200,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #12.4 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:53 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":1694331,"authorDomain":"gpnavonod"}
                  You're dreaming if you think any Democrat, sick of the direction of this country, will vote for more of the same with McCain. He might have been a 'maverick' in 2000, but not so much anymore

                  LOONYLEFT____OBAMA_____Hillary__*_{center}_McCain_______RadicalRIGHT

                  Party aside ...Who [candidate] looks like an alternative?
                  Most of Hillarys support lies in this area *...[Which is flexible]....Most of Obama's support lies farther to the Left.
                  They [Far Left] will not be able to stomach McCain.
                  But they may have to. That's no dream.

                  {"commentId":1694331,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"gpnavonod"}
                  • 2 votes
                  #12.5 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":1690846,"authorDomain":"O-K"}

                  Good article;

                  BUT Obamis IS in touch with ordinary Americans.

                  http://o-k.newsvine.com/_news/2008/04/14/1430211-obama-in-touch-six-shooter-in-a-duck-blind-huh

                  {"commentId":1690846,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"O-K"}
                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#13 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:39 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":1691226,"authorDomain":"aatticusfinch"}

                  I'm bored...
                  Maybe I'll write...

                  I consider myself to be of average intelligence (throwing that in because everyone in the Internet world seems to get off on insulting another's mental capacity, and or grammatical errors) and I've been on both sides of the political spectrum.

                  As a child, I didn't label myself a "Christian", but believed in Jesus; went to a Catholic church on holidays, said prayers at night, etc. That was the extent of my religion. Politically I was oblivious to what liberals, democrats, republicans or conservatives were. This was the early 80's and I was into Dungeons and Dragons and Marvel comics. My best friend's mother was a Christian and used to get upset when we'd play D&D. That was my first distaste of religion.
                  Into the early 90's I became a jaded introverted punk rocker-type, skipped school to go surfing, got loaded, dropped out of high school, earned my GED and went straight to college; commercial art. Most of my art was based on the church's greed, the plight of the black man, anti-government, etc. I thought I was so cool--piercings, ink all over my body, dreads (in the early 90's it was slightly more odd), I was uber anti-conformist!
                  I did the vegan thing, treated all life (including insects) with respect...and recycled.
                  One day I met a beautiful girl, "Casey", and fell in love. Anyway, Casey grew up as a Christian and had rooted those values. The wicked little devil that I was, tempted her into having sex with me...she became pregnant. At this point, my opinion on abortion was, "don't matter either way to me!" But in my mind, the RESPONSIBLE thing to do would be to marry her and support the child I had carelessly created. We planned on marrying before the baby was born. The pastor of her church who was to marry us found out that we were living together and said that he wouldn't perform the ceremony. We went to a Catholic priest who would. I'd like to add that I had a heated debate, filled with all the banal questions and answers about Christianity, with Casey's pastor. He couldn't understand why I thought the church was only after my money...
                  So Casey and I marry, the honeymoon's at Disney World, then into the "family" routine until the baby is born.
                  Long story short...our infant son died.
                  Yeah, I was bummed. I went to my father's house--he's a heavy drinking German. We got drunk on Glenfiddich and watched TV. He was always watching the news. A story about affirmative action was on and I started to question him about it. Mind you, I'm like nineteen years old and I couldn't differentiate left or right-wing if I tried. I was simply ignorant to politics. Rhetoric to me.
                  After listening to the report...I was like, duh. How does affirmative action...? I was at a loss for words. Interviews with the black culture had them declaring "whoever" as racists. I'm thinking to myself, "I'm not racist."
                  I think that that was the last time that I had that notion.

                  ***Side note***
                  I wasn't a racist, but I sure as hell am now. Out of sheer spite! I'm sorry, but @!$%#, spic, towel-head, etc...they're just words. Get over it. People getting upset about it is about as childish as the actual words.
                  Don't get me wrong, I adore most cultures. Like Asians. They come to America and prosper. Now turn on the news...do you see the Asian community @!$%#ing about anything? No. Asians are a wonderful example of a culture taking the opportunity to use what's available to them in America, and put effort into learning English.
                  Middle Easterners are another fine example of outstanding citizens--save the terrorists. I never hear a peep from them except when I have to visit Dr. Patel...or if they blow something up.
                  And of course, our Euro ancestors who come to the US of A and spend vast amounts of money in the tourism industry. Fine lot of people they are, though poor tippers I've heard.
                  That leaves out a couple unmentioned cultures! But, if I don't have anything nice to say...I won't.
                  ***

                  My political views remained stale, I grew out of the childish clothes that only seemed to matter because I had actually cared about what others thought of me. I was a husband and father now. Piercings and tattoos were simply childish.
                  As the years went by, learning about politics, I discovered that most of my beliefs fell under that of conservatism. So, this is why I'm not a democrat and never again will be.
                  1) I'm a paranoid mo-fracky. I love my family more than anything, and if keeping a shot-gun by my bed, a semi-automatic pistol in my glove box and assault rifles readily available in my home makes me feel safe...I have that right and I don't want anyone telling me different. *My children avoid my firearms like the plague, as I did growing up.
                  2) Why is it that a baby in the womb isn't "a life"...until, POOF! It pops out and it's suddenly considered murder if you kill it? Yeah, most people without morals will @!$%# anything that moves for their fifteen minutes of pleasure and to hell with the consequences. Nice attitude. Nice show of self-control. You fit in well with savages.
                  3) If I could go into a McDonalds at fifteen and acquire a paying job...so can you. If you can't afford to feed your fatherless children on minimum wage...tough luck. Maybe one of the do-gooder celebrities in Hollywood will cut you a check...but I doubt it. You should have learned some self-control. Nobody should have to pay for your mistakes.
                  4) Grow up in a bad "hood"? Po-lice harass you? Daddy beat you? Uncle Bob molested you when you were ten and now you're dancing topless for a living? Life's tough all over. Get over it. Last time I checked, free will is still in effect.
                  5) It's called ILLEGAL alien for a reason. I bet if I walked in front of you in the check-out line, you'd have something to say about it.
                  6) Prison cells should be 6x6 rooms with a hole to go in.
                  7) English is the national language. Case closed. Secondary language taught in school should be American Sign Language. Why? Because Deaf people don't have the option to speak English.
                  8) I want as little to do with the government as possible.
                  9) I don't give a rats ass what ethnic group or religion you belong to, I refuse to walk on eggshells trying not to offend anyone. If I offend you, that's not my problem and I make no apologies for it..

                  But, here's why I'm not a republican.
                  1) I hate greedy and or vain people. Though Hollywood pretty much defines vanity and greed.
                  2) I'm not "homophobic", I just don't get along with flamboyant, obnoxious people. Yes, I'm stereotyping because that's the type of homosexual that annoys me. So sue me. BUT, I think if they want to get married, more power to them. It doesn't affect my life.
                  3) The death sentence should be outlawed.
                  4) Marijuana should be legalized and drunk driving laws drastically harsher. I don't use marijuana, but am fully aware that it's a hell of a lot safer than booze.
                  5) The US of A needs to mind its own damn business when it comes to world affairs.

                  Fourteen years of marriage later, I have 2 children with one more on the way. Why? Because of morals.
                  I refuse to vote anymore. If you actually believe Obama, Clinton or McCain care about anything other than becoming president...you're delusional.
                  My life's become more mellow since eliminating politics. You can call each other names all you want, it goes to show how trivial it is. In the end, the atheist democrat will leave his computer, go up to Pizza Hut, have a pleasant conversation with the Christian server behind the counter about the weather. They'll give a "have a nice day", part, never knowing each others beliefs, and that will be that. End transmission.

                  {"commentId":1691226,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"aatticusfinch"}
                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#14 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:18 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":1691685,"authorDomain":"juli54green"}

                  Excellent essay, Marypoppin'caps.

                  Very well said.

                  Thank you for your thoughts.

                  I enjoyed reading them.

                  {"commentId":1691685,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"juli54green"}
                    #14.1 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 7:37 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":1693592,"authorDomain":"youssef51"}

                    A fine read, Mary.

                    I disagree with about 90% of what you said and enjoyed the hell out of reading it.

                    {"commentId":1693592,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"youssef51"}
                      #14.2 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:17 AM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":1691684,"authorDomain":"LetTheTruthBeTold"}
                      Troll HunterDeleted
                      {"commentId":1691939,"authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}

                      Does Obama really offer politics-of-meaning? The Clintons did that in the 90s.

                      Please don't criticize me to harshly. I don't mean to offend Obamaphiles, point out Obama's race, call him a muslim, or crush the dreams of Obama's flock.

                      But we've been here already, albeit with a white guy who should now rank behind Obama in political skills. Personally, I was never impressed with Bill Clinton's venerated speaking. But like Obama's, some just fall in love with it.

                      I "Hope". But I've been doing that long before Obama came along, before Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, etc.

                      {"commentId":1691939,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"bluecollarbytes"}
                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#16 - Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:05 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":1692507,"authorDomain":"willo"}

                      So when the economy sucks, I'm supposed to turn to the government and say "Thank you sir, may I have another?" Um, no. I'll go with God.

                      {"commentId":1692507,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"willo"}
                      • 3 votes
                      Reply#17 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:22 AM EDT
                      {"commentId":1692981,"authorDomain":"lbattros"}

                      Is this Obama calling the people in small towns that don't vote for him bigots? "antipathy toward people who aren't like them" Seems like it to me, I'm just curious why the press is on the guns and religion part of his statement and avoiding the racist part. The press needs to get a little backbone.

                      He has simply enjoyed too much success too soon and is suffering from a minor messiah complex much like you see in rock stars.

                      Obama in that recording was responding to a question by those California folks asking why those small towns weren't supporting him.....
                      Obama was faced with a segment of voters that didn't rush to form a pep rally for him, so he figured there MUST be something seriously wrong with THEM

                      Larry B

                      San Antonio, TX

                      {"commentId":1692981,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"lbattros"}
                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#18 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:17 AM EDT
                      {"commentId":1693075,"authorDomain":"coll-env"}

                      HERE WE GO AGAIN !!!

                      America is buying in to the Clinton Millionaire club !!
                      Let them back in the White house one more time for sex lies and back room deals !!
                      Come on America screw up again !!!

                      {"commentId":1693075,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"coll-env"}
                        Reply#19 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:27 AM EDT
                        {"commentId":1693226,"authorDomain":"stan-smith"}

                        "...Obama is but the latest Democrat to talk down to and insult people..."

                        What a distortion!
                        This article really focused on distorting a point of view to benefit the status quo. Please remember Bill 's expressed wish that it will be Hillary vs Mc Cain in November ! John McCain and Hillary are tag-teaming to kick out this outsider cause they "do not know him". He dares to tell the public how Washington insiders think of them, now he must face the wrath of the media. Obama admitted that his choice of words were not the best, they could be misinterpreted otherwise and was sorry for the offence yet people are feeding anger and rage. Why ? Clearly the media is being fuelled to crucify Obama under the false pretense of vetting. Now he is being termed "boy"! It seems that the real problem is not what was said but it was who said it.

                        Is it really OK to systematically erode the economic state of your own people in pursuit of delusional policies that bolster the economy of nations that could'nt care less about America? I understood from Barack's remarks that our politicians are aware of the resilience of the rural folk and so ignore their conditions to buttress the fortunes of China,India,Iraq.

                        {"commentId":1693226,"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972","authorDomain":"stan-smith"}
                          Reply#20 - Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:28 AM EDT
                          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"249771","isPrivate":false}
                          Leave a Comment:
                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                          {"threadId":"249771","contentId":"1427972"}
                          Start TrackingStart Tracking
                          Stop TrackingStop Tracking